 |
Articles
Executive Onboarding
By Angela C. Gonzalez & Richard W. Cronen
Companies and Boards of Directors often struggle to identify what went
wrong when a newly placed senior executive, who was subjected
to a rigorous screening and hiring process, does not work out. Henry
Wendt, former Chairman of Smith Kline Beecham, said, “It is very difficult
to gauge how an individual will act once he or she is at the very top
of an organization.”
Extremely
high expectations are placed on an incoming executive, and the pressure
builds immediately. Newly placed executives, especially those that
come from outside the organization, having been rigorously screened and
evaluated as to their skill sets and experience. However, as Robert
Eckert noted when he took over as the CEO of Mattel, “Jumping
into a new job is hard enough; but it is harder still when you don’t
know the customers, the competition, or the team.”
According to a study reported in HR Magazine May 2001,they reported
that 40 of the top 200 corporations in America replaced their CEO’s
in 2000. That is a 20% turnover rate among CEOs and is above the
14.4% average turnover rate for all workers as determined by the Bureau
of National Affairs.
The reasons for this revolving door at the executive level are due in
part, to the difficulties of predicting with any accuracy, how past accomplishments
will affect the executive’s future performance, and the extremely
high performance expectations that attach to senior executive positions.
The selection of the individual is just the first step in a process
to ensure a successful executive placement. Equally critical is
the process for developing and implementing a plan for the executive
to hit the ground running, in the right direction. Otherwise, the
high hopes and warm enthusiasm, the so-called “honeymoon” phase,
will not last long. Based upon his transition experience at Mattel,
Eckert recommends getting a mentor and developing a plan.
Compelling data indicates that performance is improved when a deliberate
process is used to prepare and integrate new executives. This process
is called Executive Onboarding. It is a structured and
intentional process of integration that leads to the development of sound
transition strategies that promote targeted action, with the desired
results. This dictates a period of learning, which leads the executive
to proactive, rather than reactive activity. The process can minimize
derailment, while accelerating the integration, and improving the performance
curves of newly placed senior executives.
Randolph Ward is a good example of Executive Onboarding. In
early June 2003, he was brought in to run the financially bankrupt Oakland
School District, in Northern California. When asked how he planned
to turn things around. He replied, “I don’t know
yet…it’s time for me to shut my mouth, and open my ears,
eyes, and mind.”
Unfortunately, many executives do not feel they have the “luxury” of
taking the time to gather and integrate vital information, and instead
feel pressured to act immediately. The urgency to act, real or
perceived, causes many executives to implement change strategies in an
unrealistically short time frame or to cut corners.
Mr. Ward was appointed to turn-around the Oakland School District because
of his record with the previously financially bankrupt Compton School
District in Southern California. His planning and execution resulted
in improved test scores and created financial stability over a 7-year
time frame. However, with a turnover rate of 20% at the executive
level, most executives have only 5 years or less to demonstrate their
worth by creating dramatic change.
If 5 years is the new benchmark, a formalized process of Onboarding new
executives will contribute to the long-term success of the individual and the
company, whether that person is an unknown hired from the outside, hand
picked by the Board of Directors, or promoted from within.
Despite the obvious need for Executive Onboarding, a survey
by the National Association of Corporate Directors, reported
that 45% of companies with sales of more than $500 million have no meaningful
process for grooming potential CEO’s or senior executives. However,
a recent study by Towers Perrin found that one of the elements common
to leading organizations, regardless of size, was a sound and clearly
defined talent management strategy. This is a wise investment
in both the company and the human capital.
Successful Executive Onboarding cannot be accomplished with a one-size-fits-all
approach, as the very nature of the position and the associated expectations
dictates a blend of thoroughness and flexibility in approach. An
organization is an organic web of people, processes, and systems, which
are not always apparent, and when an executive reacts to the demands
presented by their new job, they may, unwittingly, entangle themselves
in ways that limit their effectiveness. Onboarding is a process
of deliberately analyzing the organization through the lens of the people,
processes and systems that define the environment within which decisions
must be made and executed.
- People influence and are influenced by the organization’s
systems and the processes in unpredictable ways. People will
produce consistently excellent results when they have the requisite
skills and resources, and are motivated to contribute to the success
of the organization. In a High Performance Organization, the
competencies and skills required to do a job well, must be balanced
by appropriate job design and personnel development.
- Processes are linked activities designed to add
value on behalf of a customer. The goal is to improve business,
business management, and administrative processes that run through
the organization, and minimize the negative impacts of "white
space" between organizational silos.
- Systems refer to the infrastructure established
to coordinate, support and maintain the overall organization. Systems
are the formalized and institutionalized policies and procedures, technology,
supply chains, and infrastructure of the organization. A High
Performance Organization needs systems to be future focused, open,
and aligned with the goals and values of the organization.
When organizations try to integrate new executives, most orientation
programs focus upon the tangibles: business operations, performance,
strategic goals and objectives, branding and market share.
However,
what most dramatically affects the ability of a company to deliver targeted
results, are the intangibles. The things that are often
overlooked and left to chance when bringing a new executive up to speed,
are the corporate values, morale issues, retention rates, job satisfaction,
key networking relationships, key personnel, formal and informal power
structures, organizational demographics, and the culture. These
are only revealed through observation and a deliberate process of information
gathering. These are powerful factors that can either support or
derail the efforts to lead.
Successful leaders, like businesses, are a product of interdependent
networks and relationships, which are characterized by a high degree
of trust and agreement. As James Autry noted, “Business exists
only among people and for people.” In other words, business
will improve when the relationships are stronger. Onboarding gives
the new executive the opportunity to leverage these new relationships
for positive, productive outcomes:
- Without trust, there is anxiety and conflict.
- Without agreement about the goals and the means to get there, there
is confusion, waste and apathy.
While it is true that there is no foolproof method for ensuring the
future success of newly placed executives, Onboarding is a way
to improve a company’s talent management efforts, at the executive
level and down through the ranks, and the savings can be significant:
- The direct costs associated with turnover are
estimated to range from $1,000 to $10,000 per hire. These
costs include recruiting, interviewing, background checks,
and other transitional costs.
- The indirect or hidden costs associated with turnover
are estimated to be approximately 150% of the salary of the position
being filled. These costs are attributed to losses in productivity
and intellectual capital, lost opportunity costs, and lost relationship
costs (networks, customer loyalty, interdepartmental cooperation, and
employee morale, etc.).
In order to reverse the negative impact of direct and hidden
costs, companies need to foster a process of deliberate and focused
talent management, by building a bridge between the selection process
and the job itself. Objectivity and information are the key ingredients
for developing an Onboarding process that results in the development
of a crystal clear vision and a sound action plan for the executive.
Finding the right program to integrate your executives starts with an
objective A Business Coach is an effective asset that will facilitate
the execution of such a program. A coach provides the necessary
objectivity, because they are not imbedded in the organizational structure. They
facilitate the collection and analysis of information because they are
a resource dedicated only to that function. They improve the development
of a sound transition strategy because they specialize in working with
business people to develop goals and accomplish change.
- Without objectivity, the data is subject to interpretation,
filtered by attitude and opinion.
- Without a clear vision, there is confusion.
- Without a well-developed transition strategy, there is the chaos
of reactive activity in the place of proactive management.
- When initiatives fail, cynicism develops.
Professional Business Coaches add value to this process because they
represent a dedicated short-term resource, with no stakeholder ties,
thus facilitating assimilation. This provides a focused and objective
talent management program leading to higher retention rates, improved
job satisfaction, and increased productivity, and that is just for the
newly placed executive. The trickle-down savings can be substantial.
In today’s rapidly changing, high pressure, fast-paced work environment,
regardless of industry, size or location, businesses must be able to
do three things in order to improve their chances for success and to
sustain that success over the long-term:
- They must have an ability to set and achieve desired
goals
- They must use their resources efficiently
- They must be flexible and have an ability to adapt rapidly to changing
circumstances
In most cases, the businesses that are able to consistently achieve
these three objectives recognize that people make these things happen. One
of the key strategies for improving your organizational effectiveness
is through the development of its people. Mentoring is the ability
to nurture the talent you already possess in-house. Onboarding
is, for most companies, the missing ingredient to a well-planned and
well-executed talent management program for external human resources.
return to top
|
 |